Emerging Protocols Checker
Probe a domain for OAuth metadata, API discovery, A2A, MCP, Agent Skills, ARD, auth.md, WebMCP and agentic commerce protocol signals.
What this checker adds beyond a basic protocol probe
- Separates IETF RFCs from standards, drafts, proposals and operational ecosystem protocols.
- Checks nine domain-level discovery surfaces plus runtime or static hints for WebMCP and agentic commerce.
- Validates basic response shape instead of treating every HTTP 200 as a confirmed implementation.
- Explains what a missing protocol actually means and when it is irrelevant to your site.
What are emerging protocols for AI agents?
Traditional websites were designed mainly for people and general web crawlers. Agentic systems increasingly need additional machine-readable answers to questions such as: What APIs exist? Which authorization server protects this resource? Does this domain expose an MCP server or an A2A agent? What reusable skills are available? Can an agent transact with the service?
Emerging protocols try to make those answers discoverable without a developer manually configuring every integration. The important nuance is maturity. OAuth Authorization Server Metadata, OAuth Protected Resource Metadata and API Catalog are IETF Standards Track RFCs. A2A has a published v1 specification. MCP Server Card, Agent Skills domain discovery and WebMCP are still drafts or incubating work. ARD is explicitly a proposal. Commerce protocols such as UCP, ACP, x402 and MPP are evolving in parallel.
That is why this tool does not treat every missing protocol as an error. A content publisher may not need any agentic commerce protocol. An API service may benefit from OAuth metadata and API Catalog. An agent service may care about MCP or A2A. The useful output is the gap between the capabilities you actually offer and how easily a machine can discover them.
How to read the output
Detected means the expected discovery endpoint returned a usable response and basic shape checks passed. Signal means static evidence suggests a protocol implementation, but the protocol requires runtime or resource-level testing. Not detected means the common discovery location was not found. Manual check means the protocol currently has no universal domain-level endpoint that a server-side checker can safely use as proof.
The top count covers only protocols with a documented domain-level discovery surface. WebMCP, x402, MPP and ACP are reported separately because static discovery is incomplete or implementation-specific. For a broader AI-readiness assessment that also checks crawl discovery, Markdown negotiation and bot policy, use the Site Agent Readiness Checker.
Why protocol discovery belongs in an AI-readiness strategy
Readable content and good semantic HTML help an agent understand a page, but an agent-ready service may also need to expose what it can do. Discovery metadata can reduce manual integration work by giving clients a predictable place to find authorization details, APIs, agent capabilities, reusable skills or commerce interfaces. This is especially relevant for products that expect agents to authenticate, call APIs, invoke tools or complete transactions rather than only read content.
Protocol adoption should follow a real use case. Publishing a speculative descriptor that points to nothing useful does not make a site more agent-ready. Implement the underlying capability first, then expose the discovery layer that matches it.